Rabu, Disember 16, 2015

Peluncuran buku On Justice

Ini merupakan transkripsi penuh ucapan Sultan Nazrin Shah yang meluncurkan buku terbaru Prof al-Attas yang berjudul On Justice and the Nature of Man di Sasana Kijang pada 16 Disember 2016 yang bersejarah. Undangan terhad dan aku antara insan bertuah dapat mendengar syarahan satu jam Prof al-Attas selepas buku ini dilancarkan. Dah lama tak dengar syarahan Prof dan petang itu terasa damai dan tenang sekali. Gambar-gambar adalah dari kamera ip6 ku dan FB Casis.

----

‘On Justice and the nature of man’ by Prof Syed Naquib al-Attas — Sultan Nazrin


Bismillahi Rahmani Rahim
Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
Professor Syed Naquib al-Attas, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen:
Alhamdulillah, I am most grateful that Allah Subhanahu wata‘ala has given me yet another opportunity to be in the company of Professor al-Attas.  Our last occasion was five years ago when I came to launch his Festschrift, a book written by others—mostly international scholars—in honour of this great teacher, entitled Knowledge, Language, Thought and the Civilization of Islam. 
This time around, however, it is even more humbling for me, as I am here this afternoon to launch Professor al-Attas’ own book entitled On Justice and the Nature of Man.  Although slim, it is by no means lightweight.  Having finished reading it in a relatively short time, I realize that it is not only weighty in substance, but that it will take many more years for me to digest the philosophical insights he has expounded in this small volume. 
In fact, I do not at all see myself as qualified to launch this book, on two counts.  First, as I said five years ago, I consider myself a “child” compared to the venerable professor, whose age of 84 years makes him contemporary with my late father.  And secondly, I am still a novice learner at the foot of the mountain—a musāfir on my riḥlah, my own journey in seeking knowledge and wisdom—compared to the wise old man who already sits comfortably on the mountaintop.  I only hope that now, in his presence, my few remarks today will do justice to this important work.
Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
Professor Syed Naquib al-Attas, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen:
Alhamdulillah, I am most grateful that Allah Subhanahu wata‘ala has given me yet another opportunity to be in the company of Professor al-Attas.  Our last occasion was five years ago when I came to launch his Festschrift, a book written by others—mostly international scholars—in honour of this great teacher, entitled Knowledge, Language, Thought and the Civilization of Islam. 
This time around, however, it is even more humbling for me, as I am here this afternoon to launch Professor al-Attas’ own book entitled On Justice and the Nature of Man.  Although slim, it is by no means lightweight.  Having finished reading it in a relatively short time, I realize that it is not only weighty in substance, but that it will take many more years for me to digest the philosophical insights he has expounded in this small volume. 
In fact, I do not at all see myself as qualified to launch this book, on two counts.  First, as I said five years ago, I consider myself a “child” compared to the venerable professor, whose age of 84 years makes him contemporary with my late father.  And secondly, I am still a novice learner at the foot of the mountain—a musāfir on my riḥlah, my own journey in seeking knowledge and wisdom—compared to the wise old man who already sits comfortably on the mountaintop.  I only hope that now, in his presence, my few remarks today will do justice to this important work.

Ladies and genteman,
As an inheritor of the legacy of Imam al-Ghazālī (d. 1111), Professor al-Attas’ lifelong project has been to look at the philosophy of modern times, explore it, understand it, and then subject it to the tradition of Islam.  In so doing, he has built upon two premisses.  Firstly, that the Islamic tradition has the ability to relate to the contemporary world.  And secondly, that in order for it to do that, the contemporary world must be thoroughly understood.
One might assume that those premisses are obvious and self-evident. Yet, more obvious still is that the level of sophistication in Professor al-Attas’ writings, particularly in his two works, Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam and Islam and Secularism, is not at all common.  Firmly rooted within the tradition of Islam, and having gained a thorough understanding of the varied environment of the contemporary world, like the great Imam al-Ghazālī, Professor al-Attas intends his works to be nothing less than a fulfilment of his obligation to the Ummah, his fardu kifayah, which scholars today such as Dato’ Dr Afifi al-Akiti, from Oxford University, who happens to be the Orang Kaya Kaya Imam Paduka Tuan of Perak, have characterised as a “Neo-Ghazālian, Aṭṭāsian project”.
In this respect, Professor al-Attas is rare among many modern Muslim thinkers in that he does not regard modernity as being in itself a necessarily positive thing: the philosophy of modernity itself has to be subjected to the eternal principles of the Islamic worldview, in order to assess its worth properly.  In his own evaluation, modernity is deeply problematic.  Unlike many of his peers who deride certain aspects of the modern world but not the philosophy of modernisation itself, Professor al-Attas considers that philosophy to be based on premisses that require profound examination.  In a world that barely allows for any counterbalance to the intellectual preponderance of the West, such an unpopular position is hardly without challenge; and indeed this duty must often be accomplished through hardships.
There are very many examples to show that this is a continual theme in his corpus, and several bear mention today.  In his work, The Positive Aspects of Taṣawwuf, Professor al-Attas inimitably draws on the great spiritual tradition of Islam, Sufism, to form the basis of an Islamic philosophy of science.  It is rare indeed that any alternative to the modern understanding of science is posited; that it can be drawn from the depths of Sufi symbolism is particularly unique.  Later on, he chose to develop those ideas in another work, Islam and the Philosophy of Science: this, while the rest of the Muslim world was persistently and stubbornly absorbing all that Western science had to offer without considering how it might conflict with the ethics of Islam.  It was only rarely the case until now, when the ravages upon the environment can clearly be seen, that the West paused to reflect on the excesses of its Industrial Revolution—and yet, the Muslim world continues to pursue technological advancement unreflectively and at all cost.
In his work, The Nature of Man and the Psychology of the Human Soul, al-Attas draws on the philosophical writings of Imam al-Ghazālī and Ibn ‘Arabī (d. 1240) to develop a framework for an Islamic psychology and epistemology.  In yet another work, The Intuition of Existence, he contrasts a deeply metaphysical and intellectual basis for the Islamic worldview with that of modern philosophy: again, using classical scholars of Muslim thought.  Around the same time as those works, in a book entitled On Quiddity and Essence, al-Attas uses the writings of classical Sunni Ash‘arī theologians such as Imam al-Taftazānī (d. 1390) to express the Islamic worldview in our contemporary idiom, relating it to contemporary notions of metaphysics.  Once again, in a world where Western metaphysics has achieved an intellectual prominence that most in the world today readily accept without question, how distinctive it is that a Muslim philosopher not only sets out an alternative, but does so using the terminology that modern metaphysics understands and appreciates.
Ladies and gentlemen:
Building on his earlier writings, Professor al-Attas in this new book provides us with his Tafsīr, his explication and commentary, of the verses in two Sūrahs of the Qur’an: Sūrah al-Nisā’ and Sūrah al-Mu’minūn.  He shares with us his philosophical insights, which reveal his nearly unique perception, the singular crucial point of this work: that there is an intimate connection between justice, on the one hand, and the nature of man as an individual person, on the other.
On the nature of man, he asserts that the Qur’an, through Sūrah al-Mu’minūn, reveals that man is not merely a genus or a species within Creation, but a new and a special creation: mankind is not only God’s new creation, but we are also a special creation, a creation unique, unlike any other.  What makes us unique and special is the instinctive and natural sense of justice that we—all of us, Muslims and non-Muslims alike—are born with as human beings.
When he comes to the other Sūrah, the Sūrah al-Nisā’, I am particularly attracted to his philosophical deliberations on the concept of justice that arises there.  Relying on the foundations provided by our classical philosophers and theologians, Professor al-Attas gives new meaning to some of the premisses that we now take for granted from our great tradition.  Here, I must quote him extensively.  He contends that:
“Justice is a state of being, a condition of things being in their proper places.  It is also a quality of human act, a quality that springs from moral excellence whose source is wisdom.  This human act of justice is the act of putting things in their proper places...
Justice is therefore a reflection of wisdom[;] and right action, which is an act of justice, is also a reflection of wisdom.  This right action is adab in the complete and universal sense.  Adab is the discipline of body, mind and soul; the discipline that assures the recognition to one’s physical, intellectual and spiritual capacities and potentials...The condition that results from adab in the sense meant, whether in one’s self or in society, is the condition of justice.
Justice [therefore] is the condition of being in the proper place; adab is [therefore] the purposeful act by which that condition is actualized.”
It is the loss of this adab, impeccably described by Professor al-Attas in his teachings, which best describes the current problems faced by the Muslim world.  And I’m afraid that this “crisis of adab” will continue to be with us for quite some time, until we are able truly to transcend it by reconnecting with our true natures. 
I, for one, am persuaded by Professor al-Attas’ sophisticated philosophical arguments that he derives from Sūrah al-Nisā’ and Sūrah al-Mu’minūn to demonstrate the close nexus between our human nature and the concept of justice.
Indeed, the pursuit of justice has to be inextricably linked to the very nature of man, because, I believe, God has created humankind in a state of liberty, free to choose to do good rather than evil or vice versa—whether individually in our own private lives or, for some of us, collectively in our society at large.  That is why all men are created equal in the sight of God, as the Qur’an famously reminds us:
“In God’s eyes, the most honoured among you are the ones with taqwā, those most mindful of Him: God is all knowing, all aware.”
And in another verse, Allah subhanahu wa-ta‘ala says:
“Anyone, male or female, who does good, while believing, We shall grant them a happy life (in this life), and We shall reward them accordingly (in the next life) for their good works.”
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, we are all equal, inasmuch as we all have that freedom as human beings, underpinned by our own fiṭrah, our innate and natural sense of justice, to choose happiness, sa‘ādah, over unhappiness, shaqāwah, in our daily lives, whether acting justly for the public or for our own selves.  Our true inequality is only known by God, the degree of which will only be revealed to us in the next life, by the measure of the justices or injustices we chose to pursue in this life. 
This is why I believe that it is not coincidental but natural, that in almost all of the assertions of any nations’ struggle for free will, freedom and independence we witness that sense of justice linked to the core of our being and to our very human nature, the nature of mankind to pursue freely a good life in this world. 
The oldest such collective assertion for a nation is, of course, the words of Thomas Jefferson (d. 1826) in the American Declaration of Independence written in the eighteenth century:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
A more recent one, an assertion made in the last century, one that most of us had the privilege to know in our own lifetime, is the Inaugural Address made by Nelson Mandela (d. 2013) as the President of a new, freed nation of South Africa.  He said:
“Let there be justice for all.  Let there be peace for all.  Let there be work, bread, water and salt for all.  Let each know that for each the body, the mind and the soul have been freed to fulfil themselves.”
In fact, however, the one that speaks most to my heart and makes my spine tingle and I hope does so for others’, too, especially persons in positions of authority—or to use the term adopted by Professor al-Attas, “the Keepers of Trusts”—is the assertion made by the father of our nation, Yang Teramat Mulia Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Hajj Al-Marhum (d. 1990).  In the Proclamation of Independence of our own country, he declared that our beloved country (quote)
“is and with God’s blessings shall be forever a sovereign democratic and independent State founded upon the principles of liberty and justice and ever seeking the welfare and happiness of its people and the maintenance of a just peace among all nations.”
So let me say, ladies and gentlemen, that justice is what allows us all as human beings to pursue the good life and happiness that we all equally yearn for and indeed have a right to.  So long as we are true to ourselves and are guided by the sense of justice that God has created through our human nature—that unique and special creation of God that is in fact mankind—the pursuit of happiness will not only be realized as one of our unalienable rights as individual human beings, but also that we will be able to achieve a just and happy society.
As a khalīfah, a steward and representative of God in this life, but especially as someone entrusted with public office as one of the Possessors of Command, the Ūlū l-Amri, and the Keepers of Trusts, the Ahli l-Amānāt, I pray always that I can be faithful to this command of Allah Subhanahu wata‘ala in Surah al-Nisā’:
“O’ you who believe, uphold justice and bear witness to God, even if it is against yourselves, your parents, or your close relatives!  Whether the person is rich or poor, God can best take care of both.  Refrain from following your own desire, so that you can act justly—if you distort or neglect justice, God is fully aware of what you do!”
This divine Qur’anic principle of upholding justice reminds me of my late father’s moving Amanat and message to the Keepers of Trust, in his context, that of judges, asserting the need for them to maintain their freedom and independence.  In 1979, Raja Azlan Shah, as he then was, fittingly said:
“Untuk memastikan supaya tanggungjawab itu dijalankan secara adil dan saksama, tanpa mengenal bulu dan roma, tanpa mengenal asal keturunan, bangsa dan agama, tanpa menyebelahi mana-mana pihak, maka orang yang menjawat jawatan hakim mestilah terdiri dari orang yang bebas—bebas dari tekanan politik, bebas dari desakan Parlimen, bebas dari pengaruh kawan; dan keputusan yang dibuat adalah keputusan yang berlandaskan undang-undang... Dengan adanya jaminan itu, maka dapatlah Mahkamah menjalankan tanggungjawabnya secara licin, jujur dan berani demi kepentingan keadilan dan bukannya untuk kepentingan mana-mana parti pemerintah.” 
That essential Qur’anic principle of upholding justice should also remind us all of the principle of natural justice expressed in the oft-quoted aphorism of the British Lord Chief Justice Hewart, in 1924:
“Not only must justice be done, it must also be seen to be done.”
Ladies and gentlemen:
Those are stirring words—the heaven-derived ones and the ones deriving from our own human nature.  But how is that principle to be actualized and, just as crucially, why?
On this, I cannot but help end with the thoughts of our first Prime Minister at the birth of our nation.  In my estimation he perfectly sums up the natural consequences of our actions when we, the Keepers of Trusts, uphold justice in all aspects of our lives, including the way we run our nation.  For only then can we truly be what I would call the “Keepers of Justice,” only when we ourselves are able in turn to bequeath our nation to our sons and daughters in the original—if not in an even better—state   in which we inherited from our Founding Fathers.  In the presence of all of Their Royal Highnesses the Nine Malay Rulers on that much-hallowed Merdeka Day, our Tunku described this inheritance as follows:
“Justice before the law;
the legacy of an efficient public service;
and the highest standard of living in Asia.”
With this timely reminder given by Tunku Abdul Rahman to us, the inheritors and children of Malayan, and later, Malaysian liberty, it now gives me great pleasure to launch this profound and useful guide for us all: On Justice and the Nature of Man by Professor Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas.
Bismillahi Allahu Akbar!
Thank you.


Sabtu, Disember 12, 2015

The higher sufi

"It is clear that the position of the higher Sufis is not like what their opponents accused them of, that the former 'overlook the essential disparity of God and man taught by the Qur'an'. The intuition of the Reality of Existence, thus involves both the psychological and the ontological realms. The true vision if the Ultimate Reality accessible to man is based on the second stage of the intuition of Existence, which affirms both God as a Reality as well as realities other than God, and which affirms both God's Transcendence and His Immanence in relation to them."


Sumber:
The Educational Philosophy and Practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas: An Exposition of the Original Concept of Islamization by

Jumaat, Disember 11, 2015

Jatuh motor edisi kedua

Basah oleh hujan. Jatuh terseret atas jalan. Eh kereta, bagi signal sebelum belok, bukan semasa belok ya.

Kisahnya, hujan. Kereta membelok mengejut dengan signal tiba-tiba. Kereta-kereta lain terpaksa buat emergency brake. Penunggang motosikal punya dua pilihan - langgar kereta depan atau buat emergency brake sampai tergolek atas jalan... .

Perkara pertama yang aku buat selepas terseret atas jalan ialah tengok kereta belakang. Kemudian bangun, jalan sikit, kebas tangan dan kaki kemudian tengok motor. Brader-brader yang lain cepat-cepat tolong angkat motor, aku pula selamba betulkan tali kasut. Eh, sebenarnya tengah pening lalat. Nasib baik kereta belakang perlahan dan sempat brek, kalau tak entah kena lenyek hehe... .

Kawasan jatuh tadi kurang lima minit dari rumah. Sampai sahaja makan nasi dulu dalam keadaan tangan masih mengigil (sejuklah). Kemudian baru mandi dan bagi laporan (aduan :)) pada kawan (kemudian kena marah :(). .

Kaki kanan, tangan kanan, tengkuk kiri sakit juga ni. Biasalah, after shock. Semoga esok tak ada apa-apa untuk kelas dan syarahan panjang hingga malam.

Ah, lepas makan nasi dan mandi, terus ke bengkel. Tampal tayar belakang dan tarik brek. .

Sekian cerita Jumaat, 11 Disember 2015

Isnin, November 16, 2015

Bermula dengan yakin

"Jika Descartes memulakan sesuatu dengan keraguan, maka kita bermua dengan apa?" soalku pada suatu petang. Sesi kelima baca Risalah berlangsung seperti biasa pada petang Jumaat yang disirami hujan lebat. Selepas membaca beberapa perenggan, kami akan berbincang tentang perkara yang memerlukan penjelasan. Jika ada yang tidak dapat menjawab, kami biarkan soalan itu. Takah kefahaman akan sampai juga apabila menjenguk perenggan lain. Atau pun, bertanya kepada sang guru yang lebih arif.

"Kita bermula dengan keyakinan," jawab pemuda di hadapanku. "Menuntut ilmu bermula dengan yakin kerana kita tahu orang yang mengajar kita adalah yang berautoriti dan kita yakin dengan ilmunya. Kita tidak mempersoalkannya. Kita bertanya banyak padanya. Kita terus mempercayainya. Hanya apabila kita sudah berilmu banyak, barulah kita mula menyelidik dan bertanya. Pertanyaa itu namun bukan bertujuan mempersoalkan ilmu orang itu, tetapi sebagai pengukuh keyakinan."

Aku mengangguk. Cuba membayangkan apa yang dimaksudkannya.

"Sebagai contoh yang mudah. Sewaktu kecil kita diajar menunaikan solat. Kita ditunjukkan cara solat yang betul. Ketika itu kita menerima sahaja cara bersolat dari ibu bapa kita. Kita tidak mempersoalkan mengapa perlu solat atau mengapa solat begitu caranya. Sebaliknya kita menerima sahaja, mengikut dan menuruti, Ini kerana kita yakin dengan ibu bapa kita yang mengajarkan solat kepada kita. Kita yakin ibu bapa kita punya banyak ilmu dan tidak akan mengajarkan kita ilmu yang salah."

"Hanya apabila kita sudah dewasa, apabila sudah punya ilmu, barulah kita mencari sebab mengapa perlu solat dan sebagainya. Ketika itu kita tahu kewajiban bersolat dan kita bertanya bukan kerana ragu-ragu tetapi kerana mahu tahu. Begitu?" Aku cuba menambah.

"Benar. Ilmu itu akan membawa pada keyakinan. Ia memandu kita kepada kefahaman. Kita akan merasa selesa apabila yakin."

Jadi benarlah, atas sanad yang kukuh dengan ilmu yang berawalan dari Tuhan yang dibawa kepada Nabi, kita diberikan keyakinan tentang ilmu-ilmu itu. Kita dipandu dengan keyakinan. Kemudian kita akan faham dan tenang dengan kefahaman itu.

Kita bermula dengan keyakinan, bukannya keraguan seperti yang selalu Decartes nyatakan.

Khamis, November 12, 2015

Menerima anugerah

Anugerah Sastera dan Media Negeri Sembilan 2015 berlangsung di Klana Resort, Seremban malam tadi, 11 November 2015. Kira-kira dua bulan sebelum itu, aku menghantar sebeban borang dan karya untuk ditandatangani oleh Puan Mahaya, Ketua Satu PEN. Dia jugalah yang menghantarkan semuanya ke PPANS. Aku dah tak sempat berbuat apa ketika itu, kerana Wise Summer School dah nak bemula dan perlu bergegas ke Casis untuk mesyuarat akhir sebelum Wisess bermula dua minggu sesudah itu.

Kemudian, dapat kad dan surat jemputan. Tertutup aku kira majlis ini. Nak bawa pasangan pun tak boleh dan tak semua AJK atau ahli dapat jemputan. Pemilihan adalah berdasarkan karya yang terbit di media pada 2010 hingga 2014. Oleh itu dapatlah aku menghantar apa-apa karya yang ada telah tersiar dan sempat aku catatkan.

Sejak akhir-akhir ini aku memang mengelak menyertai apa-apa acara atau majlis berkaitan sastera. Bukan tak mahu, tetapi kerana sudah terikat oleh waktu yang membelenggu kaki dan tanganku. Sehingga 2018, dalam kepala, hidup dan fikiranku hanyalah Sarjana. Fokus hanyaah ke situ, oleh itu memang tidak dapat berbat apa-apa jika diminta hadir atau diminta mewakili. Cuma kadang-kaang bila berjaya menyesuaikan masa, dapatlah singgah sekejap-sekejap ke majlis.

Tetapi malam ini terasa nak hadir mengenangkan rasa hormat kepada Ketua Satu yang bersungguh-sungguh memastikan AJK PEN menghadirkan diri dan menyertai acara. Jauh di sudut hati, terdekit juga kalau-kalau menang. Kalau-kalau. Kalaulah. Tapi itu cuma 10% dari keinginan. Aku sudah diri sudah lama tidak berkarya.

Atas tujuan kerajaan meraikan penulis dan pengamal media, malam ini Menteri Besar turun padang menyampaikan hadiah. Aku seludup dua orang kawan, asalnya seorang sahaja yang boleh dibawa. Tapi aku tahu, acara sastera meja sentiasa kosong. Memang itulah yang berlaku. Mereka duduk dalam majlis sehingga selesai.

Alhamdulillah, dari lima kategori yang ada, tersangkut juga satu dalam kategori Puisi Eceran. Aku syak ini puisi 'Tidak seorang Pun Wartawan Datang Bertanya' yang memenangi Hadiah Utama Kategori Puisi, Hadiah Sastera Kumpulan Utusan 2012.  Satu kali tersiar, menang dua kali. Siapa sangka! Alhamdulillah.

Aku tak menunggu lama selepas majlis. Sebaik habis, aku bergambar di luar dan terus balik. Mereka yang lain bergambar bersama dan meraikan kemenangan masing-masing. Namun aku tidak rasa perlu diraikan dengan gembira kerana aku sudah lama tidak menulis. Aku menerima hadiah ini dengan separa malu. Hadiah ini atas karya yang lama dan karya terbaru tidak ada pun yang keluar kerana memang tidak ku hantar.  Dan juga aku lemas dengan ucapan dan pujian. Aku tidak perlukan itu, aku takutkan sanjungan. Aku hanya mahu diingatkan akan amanah ilmu yang sedang aku pikul.Kerana itu akusegera pulang. Tak mahu bertemu sesiapa.

Jadi jika kau bertanya bila aku mahu hantar dan berkarya kembali, aku tiada jawapan. Namun bagiku Eka Kurniawan sudah menyimpulkan perasaan aku buat masa ini dalam temubualnya dengan Aan Mansyur baru-baru ini:

Tapi, kemudian, aku menemukan diriku menjadi seorang penulis dan merasa butuh mempelajari sesuatu. Kenikmatan membaca tiba-tiba hilang, karena aku punya macam-macam pretensi. Apa yang bisa aku pelajari dari buku ini? Apa yang menarik dari buku ini? Kenapa buku ini menyenangkan dan apa sihrahasianya? Atau, kadang-kadang, ada godaan-godaan untuk mempertanyakan kenapa pengarang ini, misalnya, begitu terkenal. Kenapa ia dipuja-puji kritikus. Aku merasa itu masa yang sungguh tidak menyenangkan sebagai pembaca.

Tetapi, sebagai penulis, aku belajar banyak. Aku mendapatkan banyak asupan dari membaca. Aku menjadi pretensius. Aku jadi memilih-milih bacaan. Bacaanku juga menjadi agak sempit. Karena aku ingin menulis seperti ini atau seperti itu. Sebagai penulis aku ingin mempelajari hal-hal tertentu dari apa yang kubaca.

Aku butuh bukan hanya beberapa bulan, tapi bertahun-tahun, waktu untuk bisa membebaskan diriku dari masa tidak menyenangkan itu. Sekarang, bisa dibilang, aku tidak lagi peduli dengan membaca sebagai penulis. Ini titik penting buatku ketika, dalam tanda petik, aku tidak lagi terlalu peduli dengan menulis. Apakah aku akan menerbitkan buku atau tidak atau kapan? Kalau memang ada buku dan mau terbit, ya, terbit. Begitu, aku tidak lagi terbebani.

Sekarang aku lebih ingin membesarkan diriku sebagai pembaca daripada seorang penulis. Itu titik baliknya, ketika aku bisa lagi menemukan kenikmatan membaca. Aspek diriku sebagai penulis menjadi lebih minor. Aku merasa menulis hanya sebagai efek dari membaca.

Menulis hadir dengan tanggungjawab dan ilmu. Aku perlu ada ilmu untuk memikul tanggungjawab itu. Doakan aku, sobat


Buku cenderamata. Ada yang bertanya, kenapa perlu wajah pemimpin politik di kulit buku? Bukan aku yang perlu beri jawapannya.



Antara pencalonan. Pemenang langsung tak tahu apa yang dimenanginya. Zaman media sosial nampaknya keputusan perlu dikunci ketat-ketat. Tiada pengumuman hatta pada hari penyampaian



Pengiring yang teruja menyertai majlis sastera. Jangan bosan ya



Selepas ambil gambar, kami terus balik



Plak. Teruja melihat nama di atasnya



Yus di kiri dan Nora di kanan. Ratu selfie



Plak dan frame. Buku dan cek. Syukur


Rabu, November 11, 2015

Hari keraian ilmu, bukan untuk menjelmakan sikapmu


Pada aku ini bukan soal jubah ini tentang adab. Dah convo, dapat skroll, inikah cara meraikannya? Apakah mereka sedar maksud ilmu dan tanggungjawab menggalas amanah ilmu? Apakah mereka tidak insafi susah payah belajar dan perit letih di dewan kulaih? Apakah ini sikap mereka apabila menjadi orang berilmu? Apakah tujuan menuntut ilmu cuma dapat skroll, hadiri konvo dan gembira kerana berjaya melepasi zaman belajar?

Tidakkah mereka sedar cabaran yang masyarakat hadapi sekarang bila orang-orang berilmu kian keliru dengan ilmu yang ada dalam dirinya dan tidak mampu mengubah dan merubah masyarakat? Apakah mereka akan menjadi sebahagian dari masyarakat yang keliru itu? Lantas, apa tujuan mereka ke taman ilmu dan budi? Sekadar menjadi sebahagian dari statistik masyarakat yang keliru?

Wallahu a'lam


Sabtu, November 07, 2015

Apa yang Islam bawa kepada peradaban Barat?

Walaupun dah minta nak buat pembentangan minggu depan, aku minta juga giliran harini walaupun data bersepah dalam kepala. Minggu ni oleh kerana banyak kerja luar, sampai rumah terus rasa penat dan tak dapat menelaah seperti selalu. Dalam keadaan fakta tak tersusun, aku tiba-tiba dapat idea untuk membentangkan perkara lain bila melihat pembentangan kawan-kawan berfokus pada isu yang mereka minati.

Bagi menjawab soalan "What has Islam brought to Western Civilization", asalnya ingin bercakap tentang kesan Islam terhadap kesusasteraan Barat namun aku perkecilkan kepada sumbangan perpustakaan Islam sebagai sebuah institusi ilmiah kepada peradaban Barat. Ilham ini terhasil bila aku teringat pada bacaan terhadap Mehdi Nakosteen yang menceritakan bagaimana meriahnya budaya ilmu yang lahir menerusi perpustakaan pada zaman kegemilangan tamadun Islam di Baghdad dan Andalus. 
Tanpa disangka Prof puji pembentangan singkatku yang berterabur. Memang banyak sumbangan ilmuan Islam dalam bidang keilmuan yang lahir menerusi perpustakaan peribadi dan perpustakaan awam dari aktiviti terjemahan, penyalinan, kajian dan syarahan awam. Hal ini pernah aku tuliskan dalam artikel yang diterbitkan dalam buku Kapsul Nurani. Perpustakaan dahulu siap ada kopi dan bilik tidur untuk ilmuan mengkaji dan membaca tanpa perku balik ke rumah!

Minggu depan kena bentang sekali lagi dengan fakta yang tersusun dan terperinci. Dalam gambar ini, seorang teman membuat nota ringkas hasil dari pembentangan kami. Cantik tulisannya.

Terima kasih Prof, lega rasanya malam ini.

0002 Catatan India-Kashmir | Menghitung Hari

Januari tahun lalu, sudah masuk fasa berdebar-debar memandangkan tarikh untuk ke India-Kashmir semakin hampir. Mengatur kerja, menyusun buk...